The Useful Idiot

"Twelve-year-old Ahmed Musa was shot dead in Nilin, west of Ramallah, during a protest against the barrier Israel is building in the West Bank."


"Palestinian officials said he had been shot with a live bullet at close range."

I would like to hear from the supporters of Israel their condemnation of this vile act by the police officer.

This innocent 12 year old was not a so called "terrorist"! This is a blatent act of murder of a child and the officer should be charged and sentenced, but that will not happen as an Israeli life is seen to be more precious than a Palestinian.

Click to read more ...

We wre going to use stronger words but we will try and keep it clean.

On BBC 5Live Messageboards there is a piece of Antisemitic Scum who seems to enjoy protection by the BBC Moderators. We know of cases of complaint that haven't been upheld and we wonder why they protect 'him?'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/mbfivelive/ is where BBC 5Live Messageboards sit. Please read on any topic related to Israel, Palestinians or Muslims to see his infections of hate and denial of Islamic Terrorism. Complain! Complain! Complain!

This is truly a piece of Antisemtic scum that is a stain on the BBC who seems to sustain him as their lead hate figure. He denies there are any guilty terrorists and he denies that Israel has a legitimate existence. He has the usual mantras of !Aprtheid", "Nazi", "Opression" etc.

Get him fellow Idiots!

http://www.mpacuk.org/content/view/4824/#jreactions

The video is mysteriously edited and disputed according to Israel.

The comments are vile!

One idiot actually thinks the man was killed!!! Goes to show how blind Islamist hate can invent its own realities.

Actually, in a sense they didn't withdraw it they simply hid the article why they debated whether it was libellous or not (we suspect) then removed the slur "ZioNazi" - but so badly did they do it while feverishly perspiring over the nasty slur that they posted the  changed paragraph twice. We KNOW they wrote "ZioNazi" because we have the screen capture. We will show it later (its on a laptop we don't have here right now)

http://www.mpacuk.org/content/view/4796/102/

Here is the re-write. We didn't check it for any other changes.

And then look at the vile and libellous comments they have drawn

UPDATE: The original as promised

UPDATE: MPAC UK have now hidden this article. But we have the full screen capture!! He He!

Stephen, if you would like to recive a copy of the screen capture then leave a message in your blog. We might be Idiots but we can also be Useful!

MPAC UK try to pretend they steer clear of attacking Jews by labelling them all Zionists. If they want to attack you then its because THEY have labelled you a Zionist - and thats OK then. There are many times they have been caught out attacking "Jews" rather than "Zionists" or "Israelis" and so we believe they are simply Antisemitic but badly hiding it.

In a previous item we referred to Stephen Pollard who mentions in hiis blog at The Spectator that he discovered MPAC UK were using a logo as if to suggest that they were being sponsored by the organisation who's logo it is. The organisation confirmed to Pollard that the logo was being used without their permission and that they were NOT sponsoring MPAC UK.

MPAC UK then goes on the most disgusting attack on Stephen Pollard, accusing him of being a "Zionist" and a "ZioNazi" - neither of which label Stephen Pollard would possibly apply to himself. He is, however, Jewish and it may be that fact that has defined MPAC UK's attack on him.

The attack is here http://www.mpacuk.org/content/view/4796/102/ "Zionist Stephen Pollard Upset At MPACUK ". We wonder, did they confirm that Pollard would call himself a "Zionist" or is being a "Jew" enough for them.

Look at how they illustrate their attack:-

What connection is there between Stephen Pollard and some writing on a wall somewhere in Israel? They are implying that Stephen Pollard is someone for whom these sentiments are within his own belief system and morality. They have no right to use this image to attack Pollard and imply things about him that are not substantiated.

What is fascinating to MPACUK is how upset the ZioNazi’s get when we ask Muslims to get involved in the mainstream. They get upset that we tell Muslims to get involved in the Democratic institutions of this country because the last thing they want is for Muslims to have any influence within the country. Gangsters after all don’t like competition.

Ergo, Pollard is a "Zionazi Gangster" according to MPAC UK.

Stephen Pollard a right wing extremist and Islamophobe and commenter for the right wing, often borderline Muslim hate sites, and watches MPACUK like a hawk. So much so that when we put an advert up on our site from the ‘journalism diversity fund’ he had to change his nappy, he got so excited!

Great libelling right there. Pollard is a "right-wing extremist and Islamaphpobe" eh?

Of course Islamophobic racists don’t like Muslims being involved in the mainstream, so can you believe he actually called the people up to see if they were sponsored by what he called 'an extremist group?' Bit like the Klu Klux Klan claiming blacks are extremists but in this day and age any old bigot can get away with saying any Muslim group is ‘extremist’, ‘radical’ or ‘jihadist’ or what ever words they want to make up to trick the public into being afraid and trusting them as protectors.

That’s not the bit MPACUK are concerned about; a Zionist is going to watch MPACUK, like the Klu Klux Klan watched Malcolm X.

The concern is how easily these Zionists and racists can use words like extremist about any group, and mainstream media and politicians accept it. In short the language of racism and stereotyping is now considered acceptable.

Keep going MPAC UK we can see the damages mounting!

And yet again I call to your attention, Muslim brothers and sisters, the tiniest line on our website if found slightly wanting is set upon by giant media outlets like the Spectator

Brilliant! Drag The Spectator into this. Pollard just blogs in The Spectator we shouldn't assume The Spectator IS Stephen Pollard.

AND THEN THEY ADMIT THEY WERE GUILTY AS CHARGED!!!!

His claim to fame - that the words ‘our sponsors’ was above the advert in tiny words; We normally put paid adverts in this section but because we realised the great work the journalism fund was doing was just what young Muslims needed – we put the advert up for free

YOU WERE CAUGHT OUT BY POLLARD AND YOU'VE HAD TO CHANGE IT - HAVEN'T YOU???

Here is the original

CLEARLY YOU SAID THAT THE JOURNALISM DIVERSITY FUND WAS A SPONSOR (or an Advert)!!!

Here is how you changed it

HENCE THE JOURNALISM DIVERSITY FUND LOGO SEEMS TO BE USED AS IF THEY ARE NOW A PROMOTION!!!!

Did you ask them if they are happy to be "Promoted" by you?

Stephen Pollard Blog says http://www.spectator.co.uk/stephenpollard/827896/mpacuk-caught-out.thtml

This morning's MPACUK web site carries their logo under the caption: Our sponsors/advertisers.

 

...So I emailed the Journalism Diversity fund to ask if they were indeed funding MPACUK at any level, whether advertising or funding a trainee from MPACUK or to do an internship with them.

Back came a response within half an hour. It was from the JDF administrator, who wrote:

I have never heard of the website you mentioned.  It looks like this organisation has copied the info from the Journalism Diversity Fund website and pasted it into their own website.

 

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

I wonder how long the JDF logo will stay on the MPACUK web site? I've taken a screen shot of the logo up on the site, and I hope to upload it before long.

Here is the evidence in case it disappears:-

24 hours after a Palestinia Terrorist killed and maimed Israelis with a bulldozer rampage in Jerusalem MPAC UK has the headline "Bulldozed By Al Jazeera".

Then we get THIS piece of crap

However, today the bubble burst. I was aghast at the blatant lack of balance in Al Jazeera's 5pm top news bulletin regarding the Palestinian bulldozer attack in West Jerusalem, and more shocked to be savaged by one of their representatives when I telephoned to give my feedback.

No Live Interviews with Palestinian Representatives

You need to see the TV coverage to understand my sentiments in full; I was genuinely sad about the needless loss of human life - three Israeli civilians dead and dozens injured. However, as I watched the coverage I became shocked at the pro-Israel bias, which included an interview with a representative of the Jerusalem Post.

No such coverage was afforded to any Palestinian representative to negate the accusations of Palestinian ‘terrorism' nor did they provide any reference for contextual purposes, to the hundreds of Palestinians that have been killed since the start of the year. In fact, is there any official record of Palestinian deaths or are they just ‘collateral damage'? The bulletin's sole representation from the Palestinians: a statement from Hamas in which, according to Al-Jazeera's website Hamas called the attack:

"the natural result of continuing Israeli aggression and crimes against our people in the West Bank and occupied Jerusalem."

Now whilst the Zionists are given the right to live interviews to spin their propaganda to make the attack seem like a regular daily occurrence, the Palestinians who are occupied and under daily attack by the Israelis are denied the right to have their position put on an equal footing.

"Give me a break, lady"

I phoned Al Jazeera English to air my grievance and the initial point of contact listened courteously, acknowledged my comments and then put me through to someone who I understand has some editorial control. She was rude, abrupt and downright aggressive. She barked "Give me a break, lady" and said they were still working on the story as it was breaking news (even though according to the Al Jazeera website:

"The attack, which occured just after midday (0900 GMT) on Wednesday".

This ‘editor' then advised me that they were showing pictures of the Palestinian's home and interviewing his family in later broadcasts. After a minute or two, she told me she couldn't spend hours talking to me as she had to work on the next bulletin and sarcastically said goodbye and hung up!! Clearly not Al Jazeera's greatest Public Relations asset. What a disgrace!!

WHAT A DISGRACE!!!

Who gives a fig about what Palestinians think? Where are the photos of them whooping with delight, ululating and handing out sweets. The fact that we can't see those images is the bias.

At MPAC UK Messageboard the headline screams   "BNP bomb plotter guilty "  http://forum.mpacuk.org/showthread.php?p=518186#post518186.

BBC NEWS
Man guilty over nail-bombs plot

A Nazi sympathiser who kept nail bombs under his bed has been convicted of three terrorism offences.

Martyn Gilleard, 31, of Goole, East Yorkshire, was a paid-up member of the National Front, the White Nationalist Party and the British People's Party.

Police officers discovered four home-made nail bombs, as well as bullets and bladed weapons in his flat.

Prosecutors said Gilleard had written that he had wanted to "save" Britain from "multi-racial peril".

Gilleard was convicted of preparing for terrorist acts and possessing articles and collecting information for terrorist purposes.

During the trial, he admitted having a collection of Nazi memorabilia, saying Nazism appealed to him because of the way the Nazis had "rebuilt" Germany.

Officers had found "potentially lethal bladed weapons", 34 bullets for a 2.2 calibre firearm and printouts from the internet about committing acts of terrorism, the court heard.

These included instructions on how to make a bomb and how to kill someone with poison.....

Blah and so forth.

Its just that this miscreant ISN'T A MEMBER OF THE BNP!!!!! Doh!!!

Its LIBEL!

http://www.mpacuk.org/content/view/4734/103/#jreactions

Oh, and Islamists sites (Like MPAC UK?) are put up by Mossad to discredit Muslims. Given the Islamist sites we've seen then they don't need Mossad's help

BTW - We are run by Mossad. Obviously!

Look, we aren't disparaging that fact that Muslims can't produce great minds and thinkers. http://forum.mpacuk.org/showthread.php?p=517904#post517904 A Poll that seems to have ONLY been publicised in Turkey has resulted in the top ten being Muslims. They Love it a MPAC UK. They lap it up!

Until..........

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/23/turkey.islam

A hitherto largely unknown Turkish Islamic scholar, Fethullah Gülen, has been voted the world's top intellectual in a poll to find the leading 100 thinkers.

Gülen, the author of more than 60 books, won a landslide triumph after the survey - which is organised by the British magazine, Prospect, and Foreign Policy, a US publication - attracted more than 500,000 votes.

The top 10 individuals were all Muslim and included two Nobel laureates, the novelist Orhan Pamuk, who is also Turkish, at No 4, and the Iranian human rights lawyer Shirin Ebadi, in 10th.

The result surprised organisers, who attributed it to a sustained campaign by Gülen's followers, known as the Gülen Movement, after Turkey's biggest-selling newspaper, Zaman, publicised the poll.

Prospect's editor, David Goohart, admitted to not having previously heard of Gülen and said his supporters had "made a mockery" of the poll. But he said the result flagged up significant political trends in Turkey.

Ohhhhh!!!! So you publicise the poll in a Turkish newspaper and you expect Noam Chomsky or Aldous Huxley to be voted-for????

LOL!!!!