The Useful Idiot

UPDATE: MPAC UK have now hidden this article. But we have the full screen capture!! He He!

Stephen, if you would like to recive a copy of the screen capture then leave a message in your blog. We might be Idiots but we can also be Useful!

MPAC UK try to pretend they steer clear of attacking Jews by labelling them all Zionists. If they want to attack you then its because THEY have labelled you a Zionist - and thats OK then. There are many times they have been caught out attacking "Jews" rather than "Zionists" or "Israelis" and so we believe they are simply Antisemitic but badly hiding it.

In a previous item we referred to Stephen Pollard who mentions in hiis blog at The Spectator that he discovered MPAC UK were using a logo as if to suggest that they were being sponsored by the organisation who's logo it is. The organisation confirmed to Pollard that the logo was being used without their permission and that they were NOT sponsoring MPAC UK.

MPAC UK then goes on the most disgusting attack on Stephen Pollard, accusing him of being a "Zionist" and a "ZioNazi" - neither of which label Stephen Pollard would possibly apply to himself. He is, however, Jewish and it may be that fact that has defined MPAC UK's attack on him.

The attack is here http://www.mpacuk.org/content/view/4796/102/ "Zionist Stephen Pollard Upset At MPACUK ". We wonder, did they confirm that Pollard would call himself a "Zionist" or is being a "Jew" enough for them.

Look at how they illustrate their attack:-

What connection is there between Stephen Pollard and some writing on a wall somewhere in Israel? They are implying that Stephen Pollard is someone for whom these sentiments are within his own belief system and morality. They have no right to use this image to attack Pollard and imply things about him that are not substantiated.

What is fascinating to MPACUK is how upset the ZioNazi’s get when we ask Muslims to get involved in the mainstream. They get upset that we tell Muslims to get involved in the Democratic institutions of this country because the last thing they want is for Muslims to have any influence within the country. Gangsters after all don’t like competition.

Ergo, Pollard is a "Zionazi Gangster" according to MPAC UK.

Stephen Pollard a right wing extremist and Islamophobe and commenter for the right wing, often borderline Muslim hate sites, and watches MPACUK like a hawk. So much so that when we put an advert up on our site from the ‘journalism diversity fund’ he had to change his nappy, he got so excited!

Great libelling right there. Pollard is a "right-wing extremist and Islamaphpobe" eh?

Of course Islamophobic racists don’t like Muslims being involved in the mainstream, so can you believe he actually called the people up to see if they were sponsored by what he called 'an extremist group?' Bit like the Klu Klux Klan claiming blacks are extremists but in this day and age any old bigot can get away with saying any Muslim group is ‘extremist’, ‘radical’ or ‘jihadist’ or what ever words they want to make up to trick the public into being afraid and trusting them as protectors.

That’s not the bit MPACUK are concerned about; a Zionist is going to watch MPACUK, like the Klu Klux Klan watched Malcolm X.

The concern is how easily these Zionists and racists can use words like extremist about any group, and mainstream media and politicians accept it. In short the language of racism and stereotyping is now considered acceptable.

Keep going MPAC UK we can see the damages mounting!

And yet again I call to your attention, Muslim brothers and sisters, the tiniest line on our website if found slightly wanting is set upon by giant media outlets like the Spectator

Brilliant! Drag The Spectator into this. Pollard just blogs in The Spectator we shouldn't assume The Spectator IS Stephen Pollard.

AND THEN THEY ADMIT THEY WERE GUILTY AS CHARGED!!!!

His claim to fame - that the words ‘our sponsors’ was above the advert in tiny words; We normally put paid adverts in this section but because we realised the great work the journalism fund was doing was just what young Muslims needed – we put the advert up for free

YOU WERE CAUGHT OUT BY POLLARD AND YOU'VE HAD TO CHANGE IT - HAVEN'T YOU???

Here is the original

CLEARLY YOU SAID THAT THE JOURNALISM DIVERSITY FUND WAS A SPONSOR (or an Advert)!!!

Here is how you changed it

HENCE THE JOURNALISM DIVERSITY FUND LOGO SEEMS TO BE USED AS IF THEY ARE NOW A PROMOTION!!!!

Did you ask them if they are happy to be "Promoted" by you?