The Useful Idiot

It seems there are no boundaries for Israel-hating BBC. It is a rule of BBC 5Live messageboard that only ONE thread is allowed about a news item. Except BBC just broke their rules on a news item (five days old) whereby Reuters expressed their opinions about a cameraman caught up in the Israel Palestinian conflict.

The BBC have allowed this subject to be discussed TWICE and have eben allowed the use of the SAME BBC source twice. This is against their own rules concerning posting at the messageboard.

One of their rules for removing a message or thread  states:-

It is well-known that if you post a thread that someone else has started then the subsequent threads are removed.

BUT NOT IF YOUR THREAD BASHES ISRAEL. IT SEEMS THE BBC WILL BREAK THEIR OWN RULES!!

Here is thread One http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/mbfivelive/F2148565?thread=5776061 - from the same day as the news item appeared.

Here is thread TWO which shouldn't be allowed by BBC Rules http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/mbfivelive/F2148565?thread=5791715

They reference THE SAME BBC NEWS ITEM!!!!!! http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7560672.stm dated 14th August. Today is 19th August - its not even News anymore.

Demand to know from the BBC why they have allowed this in contravention of their rules despite at least one complaint having been made to the BBC Moderators. Maximum Publicity Please!

Al Guardian lauds the attempts of some activists to break the 'Gaza blockade" http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/aug/05/israelandthepalestinians.middleeast "Cherie Blair's sister joins battle to break Gaza blockade". BATTLE???????

But the 'starving?" Gazans have used their tunnels to smuggle in ANIMALS FOR THE ZOO!!!! http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1009861.html

Lauran Booth shouldn't waste her time in one of those wooden boats that might be scupperd by getting too close to the wrong type of ship. She should be loading Elephants. Now watch how low that boat is now Lauren!!!

Lets face it, Al Guardian seems to be an  Antisemitic rag as a recent report about the content of their Comment is Free sections seems to demonstrate.

We monitor BBC 5Live Messageboards and also have information about who posts there. Recently there have been a spate of arguments about Israel and The Palestinians. One of the features is that known Antisemite posters like "Brandon", "pak4life", "GENRAL FFC" , "Cerebrus" have been goading other posters with more than a few lies. (we wonder if BBC would allow a poster to call themselves "yid4life")

Consequently, one of the main defenders of the truth has told us that their account has now been subject to pre-moderation for absolutely no reason other than they are prepared to not let other posters get away with lies and Antisemitic comments. It is possible that their account has been sanctioned simply for complaining too much. Yet, if the volume of bile increases so the number of complaints goes up. The answer is to complain from a pc that has never had a BBC 5Live cookie.

We then learn of an even MORE disturbing case where someone with a new posting account had made a few posts under the mandatory rule that all new posters are subject to pre-moderator status. They made a few posts that had nothing to do with any Israel/Palestinian issue. Spotted a poster who was praising Hezbollah and said they hoped Hezbollah would take back Shebaa Farms from Israel.

This new poster happened to know that Shebaa Farms is recognised by the UN as being part of Syria and subject to negotiations between Israel and Syria. The poster merely pointed this out by referencing a quote from and Israeli website quoting an Israeli govt position - and the next thing they discovered was the post was Hidden and they have been locked out of posting at BBC 5Live.

On this basis we feel we can state that this indicates an extreme prejudice by BBC against anyone prepared to defend the position of Israel against the lies they allow to be posted at 5Live.

http://www.mpacuk.org/content/view/4870/102/#jreactions

So, when Muslims in polls state they support suicide bombings (hence attacks possibly against UK citizens as in 7/7), and Muslim who state that 7/7 was justified, any Muslim who goes abroad to fight against British troops etc are also guilty of treason by this logic.

We think that anyone prepared to fight against the people of your home country are potentially guilty of treason. However, we don't see people with sympathies for Israel bombing the hell out of their fellow citizens, or planning to.

"Twelve-year-old Ahmed Musa was shot dead in Nilin, west of Ramallah, during a protest against the barrier Israel is building in the West Bank."


"Palestinian officials said he had been shot with a live bullet at close range."

I would like to hear from the supporters of Israel their condemnation of this vile act by the police officer.

This innocent 12 year old was not a so called "terrorist"! This is a blatent act of murder of a child and the officer should be charged and sentenced, but that will not happen as an Israeli life is seen to be more precious than a Palestinian.

Click to read more ...

We wre going to use stronger words but we will try and keep it clean.

On BBC 5Live Messageboards there is a piece of Antisemitic Scum who seems to enjoy protection by the BBC Moderators. We know of cases of complaint that haven't been upheld and we wonder why they protect 'him?'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/mbfivelive/ is where BBC 5Live Messageboards sit. Please read on any topic related to Israel, Palestinians or Muslims to see his infections of hate and denial of Islamic Terrorism. Complain! Complain! Complain!

This is truly a piece of Antisemtic scum that is a stain on the BBC who seems to sustain him as their lead hate figure. He denies there are any guilty terrorists and he denies that Israel has a legitimate existence. He has the usual mantras of !Aprtheid", "Nazi", "Opression" etc.

Get him fellow Idiots!

http://www.mpacuk.org/content/view/4824/#jreactions

The video is mysteriously edited and disputed according to Israel.

The comments are vile!

One idiot actually thinks the man was killed!!! Goes to show how blind Islamist hate can invent its own realities.

Actually, in a sense they didn't withdraw it they simply hid the article why they debated whether it was libellous or not (we suspect) then removed the slur "ZioNazi" - but so badly did they do it while feverishly perspiring over the nasty slur that they posted the  changed paragraph twice. We KNOW they wrote "ZioNazi" because we have the screen capture. We will show it later (its on a laptop we don't have here right now)

http://www.mpacuk.org/content/view/4796/102/

Here is the re-write. We didn't check it for any other changes.

And then look at the vile and libellous comments they have drawn

UPDATE: The original as promised

UPDATE: MPAC UK have now hidden this article. But we have the full screen capture!! He He!

Stephen, if you would like to recive a copy of the screen capture then leave a message in your blog. We might be Idiots but we can also be Useful!

MPAC UK try to pretend they steer clear of attacking Jews by labelling them all Zionists. If they want to attack you then its because THEY have labelled you a Zionist - and thats OK then. There are many times they have been caught out attacking "Jews" rather than "Zionists" or "Israelis" and so we believe they are simply Antisemitic but badly hiding it.

In a previous item we referred to Stephen Pollard who mentions in hiis blog at The Spectator that he discovered MPAC UK were using a logo as if to suggest that they were being sponsored by the organisation who's logo it is. The organisation confirmed to Pollard that the logo was being used without their permission and that they were NOT sponsoring MPAC UK.

MPAC UK then goes on the most disgusting attack on Stephen Pollard, accusing him of being a "Zionist" and a "ZioNazi" - neither of which label Stephen Pollard would possibly apply to himself. He is, however, Jewish and it may be that fact that has defined MPAC UK's attack on him.

The attack is here http://www.mpacuk.org/content/view/4796/102/ "Zionist Stephen Pollard Upset At MPACUK ". We wonder, did they confirm that Pollard would call himself a "Zionist" or is being a "Jew" enough for them.

Look at how they illustrate their attack:-

What connection is there between Stephen Pollard and some writing on a wall somewhere in Israel? They are implying that Stephen Pollard is someone for whom these sentiments are within his own belief system and morality. They have no right to use this image to attack Pollard and imply things about him that are not substantiated.

What is fascinating to MPACUK is how upset the ZioNazi’s get when we ask Muslims to get involved in the mainstream. They get upset that we tell Muslims to get involved in the Democratic institutions of this country because the last thing they want is for Muslims to have any influence within the country. Gangsters after all don’t like competition.

Ergo, Pollard is a "Zionazi Gangster" according to MPAC UK.

Stephen Pollard a right wing extremist and Islamophobe and commenter for the right wing, often borderline Muslim hate sites, and watches MPACUK like a hawk. So much so that when we put an advert up on our site from the ‘journalism diversity fund’ he had to change his nappy, he got so excited!

Great libelling right there. Pollard is a "right-wing extremist and Islamaphpobe" eh?

Of course Islamophobic racists don’t like Muslims being involved in the mainstream, so can you believe he actually called the people up to see if they were sponsored by what he called 'an extremist group?' Bit like the Klu Klux Klan claiming blacks are extremists but in this day and age any old bigot can get away with saying any Muslim group is ‘extremist’, ‘radical’ or ‘jihadist’ or what ever words they want to make up to trick the public into being afraid and trusting them as protectors.

That’s not the bit MPACUK are concerned about; a Zionist is going to watch MPACUK, like the Klu Klux Klan watched Malcolm X.

The concern is how easily these Zionists and racists can use words like extremist about any group, and mainstream media and politicians accept it. In short the language of racism and stereotyping is now considered acceptable.

Keep going MPAC UK we can see the damages mounting!

And yet again I call to your attention, Muslim brothers and sisters, the tiniest line on our website if found slightly wanting is set upon by giant media outlets like the Spectator

Brilliant! Drag The Spectator into this. Pollard just blogs in The Spectator we shouldn't assume The Spectator IS Stephen Pollard.

AND THEN THEY ADMIT THEY WERE GUILTY AS CHARGED!!!!

His claim to fame - that the words ‘our sponsors’ was above the advert in tiny words; We normally put paid adverts in this section but because we realised the great work the journalism fund was doing was just what young Muslims needed – we put the advert up for free

YOU WERE CAUGHT OUT BY POLLARD AND YOU'VE HAD TO CHANGE IT - HAVEN'T YOU???

Here is the original

CLEARLY YOU SAID THAT THE JOURNALISM DIVERSITY FUND WAS A SPONSOR (or an Advert)!!!

Here is how you changed it

HENCE THE JOURNALISM DIVERSITY FUND LOGO SEEMS TO BE USED AS IF THEY ARE NOW A PROMOTION!!!!

Did you ask them if they are happy to be "Promoted" by you?

Stephen Pollard Blog says http://www.spectator.co.uk/stephenpollard/827896/mpacuk-caught-out.thtml

This morning's MPACUK web site carries their logo under the caption: Our sponsors/advertisers.

 

...So I emailed the Journalism Diversity fund to ask if they were indeed funding MPACUK at any level, whether advertising or funding a trainee from MPACUK or to do an internship with them.

Back came a response within half an hour. It was from the JDF administrator, who wrote:

I have never heard of the website you mentioned.  It looks like this organisation has copied the info from the Journalism Diversity Fund website and pasted it into their own website.

 

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

I wonder how long the JDF logo will stay on the MPACUK web site? I've taken a screen shot of the logo up on the site, and I hope to upload it before long.

Here is the evidence in case it disappears:-